Argumentation-Based Risk Management
نویسندگان
چکیده
Collaborative risk management is a fundamental task in project management. This paper discusses a new collaborative approach to risk management which is grounded on the integration of dialogue games and argument schemes from argumentation research. In particular, we propose a new dialogue game to organize risk discussions, and the exploitation of typical argument schemes for risk management on the collection of more complete arguments. A new collaborative Risk Discussion System is discussed and evaluated, where its environment is capable of structuring and recording risk discussions in a project management memory.
منابع مشابه
Case-based Reasoning for Experience-based Collaborative Risk Management
In a collaborative risk management scenario, project stakeholders often need natural forms of recording and reusing past risk management experiences so that they could better assess whether there are threats to the goals of new projects. The contribution of this paper is to propose an enhanced case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to support project participants to exploit such experiences which ...
متن کاملAn Argumentation Framework for Deriving Qualitative Risk Sensitive Preferences
Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain conclusions, since defeasible conclusions may turn out no...
متن کاملArgument-based applications to knowledge engineering
Argumentation is concerned with reasoning in the presence of imperfect information by constructing and weighing up arguments. It is an approach for inconsistency management in which connict is explored rather than eradicated. This form of reasoning has proved applicable to many problems in knowledge engineering that involve uncertain, incomplete or inconsistent knowledge. This paper concentrate...
متن کاملArgumentation Schemes for Collaborative Debate of Requirement Risks in Software Projects
Managing risks in real-world software projects is of paramount importance. A significant class of such risks is related to the engineering of requirements, commonly involving the presentation and analysis of risk management arguments from both software engineers and clients involved in collaborative debates. In this work, drawing inspiration from argumentation theory in Artificial Intelligence,...
متن کاملValue-based models for ontology-driven, legal risk management and compliance
In this paper, we motivate how value-based modelling could be utilised for an integrated perspective to compliance design. Using value models for startups, it is possible to apply a methodology to determine the applicable legal provisions which are then customised to fit the value model using legal interpretation and argumentation. The result is a compliance pattern which helps determine the im...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013